yep. Obama, as we prev. discussed, is first and foremost a pragmaticist - he is not going to suffer bad PR because of a horny dirty-mouthed middle-aged teenager.
oh, baloney. Rahm is not half as smart as Obama and is 100 times as arrogant. his appointment was partly to please/appease the lobby of you -know-who ( me!) and partly to pay for old political debt.
however i will take Rahm over eitehr SPector or Lieberman
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
huh?
Date: 2009-05-10 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-10 05:52 pm (UTC)завиральная идея. не пройдет.
Date: 2009-05-10 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-10 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-10 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-10 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-10 07:43 pm (UTC)Rahm is not half as smart as Obama and is 100 times as arrogant. his appointment was partly to please/appease the lobby of you -know-who ( me!) and partly to pay for old political debt.
however i will take Rahm over eitehr SPector or Lieberman
no subject
Date: 2009-05-11 02:46 am (UTC)Rahm is just a little fascist. His proper place is on a rope, swinging from a tree limb.
Re: huh?
Date: 2009-05-10 08:01 pm (UTC)Re: huh?
Date: 2009-05-10 08:09 pm (UTC)Re: huh?
Re: huh?
Date: 2009-05-11 01:25 pm (UTC)Re: huh?
Date: 2009-05-11 01:34 pm (UTC)Я с вами не знакома и знакомиться не собираюсь.
Во-вторых, а как Вам нравится во-первых.
Re: huh?
Date: 2009-05-11 01:43 pm (UTC)По второму пункту: да ради бога.
По третьему: как-то вы запутанно выражаетесь. Что сказать-то хотели?
Re: huh?
Date: 2009-05-11 03:44 pm (UTC)