Про газеты, офигительное
May. 22nd, 2009 09:52 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
birdwatcherВот тут (Блумберг Топ) объясняется, что газеты умирают, потому что все новости доступны из гугла. И это, мол, очень жалко: Who would cover the news? The blogger next door?
Почему же газеты разрешают гуглу копировать себе новости? Могли бы opt out, гугл дает такую возможность. А потому, что по ссылкам со скопированных в гугл новостей на их вебсайты приходят посетители. Newspapers desperate for eyeballs on their Web sites have a hard time saying no to that, especially when their less-queasy competitors would benefit.
Полезный совет: But if all of them opted out, the search engines, the aggregators and their readers might realize that news is worth paying for. News organizations could do so individually, without collusion, if they had the intestinal fortitude for it. Ума, видите ли, не хватает.
Внимание, решение: Congress could help them out by amending the law to make clear that scooping up Web sites infringes copyrights, argue Brown and Sanford in an op-ed piece last week in the Washington Post.
Или: Newspapers could also step up efforts to persuade Congress to ease up on antitrust law, at least temporarily, so they can work together to figure out a way to keep professional journalism alive in the Internet age.
Это у нас ведущие издания такие, Вашингтонский Пост и Блумберг.
Почему же газеты разрешают гуглу копировать себе новости? Могли бы opt out, гугл дает такую возможность. А потому, что по ссылкам со скопированных в гугл новостей на их вебсайты приходят посетители. Newspapers desperate for eyeballs on their Web sites have a hard time saying no to that, especially when their less-queasy competitors would benefit.
Полезный совет: But if all of them opted out, the search engines, the aggregators and their readers might realize that news is worth paying for. News organizations could do so individually, without collusion, if they had the intestinal fortitude for it. Ума, видите ли, не хватает.
Внимание, решение: Congress could help them out by amending the law to make clear that scooping up Web sites infringes copyrights, argue Brown and Sanford in an op-ed piece last week in the Washington Post.
Или: Newspapers could also step up efforts to persuade Congress to ease up on antitrust law, at least temporarily, so they can work together to figure out a way to keep professional journalism alive in the Internet age.
Это у нас ведущие издания такие, Вашингтонский Пост и Блумберг.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 03:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 03:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 03:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 08:57 pm (UTC)