Новости из интеллектуальной столицы: Police shut down the [kiddie] lemonade stand on Salem Common after the sausage man complained that the boys didn't have a permit and were taking customers away from him.
I hope it was not just a call, but he actually submitted an affidavit stating the probable cause (and NOT possible cause) and signed it under oath, as required. Anything less would be a conspiracy to harass, am I wrong?
Due Process
Date: 2005-08-04 04:57 pm (UTC)Re: Due Process
Date: 2005-08-04 04:59 pm (UTC)Re: Due Process
Date: 2005-08-04 05:01 pm (UTC)Re: Due Process
Date: 2005-08-04 05:05 pm (UTC)Re: Due Process
Date: 2005-08-04 05:07 pm (UTC)Re: Due Process
Date: 2005-08-04 06:35 pm (UTC)So what would be a due process on the part of the defendant if this were the case?
Alternatively, how one proves the fact of conspiracy to harass?
Re: Due Process
Date: 2005-08-04 06:41 pm (UTC)Re: Due Process
Date: 2005-08-04 06:48 pm (UTC)