Ктулху частные и государственные
Mar. 25th, 2008 06:34 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
birdwatcherThe Globe and Mail -- Google Inc. is a year into its ground-shifting strategy to change the way people communicate and work.
But the initiative to reinvent the way that people use software is running headlong into another new phenomenon of the information technology age: the unprecedented powers of security officials in the United States to conduct surveillance on communications.
Some organizations are banning Google's innovative tools outright to avoid the prospect of U.S. spooks combing through their data. Security experts say many firms are only just starting to realize the risks they assume by embracing Web-based collaborative tools hosted by a U.S. company, a problem even more acute in Canada where federal privacy rules are at odds with U.S. security measures.
But the initiative to reinvent the way that people use software is running headlong into another new phenomenon of the information technology age: the unprecedented powers of security officials in the United States to conduct surveillance on communications.
Some organizations are banning Google's innovative tools outright to avoid the prospect of U.S. spooks combing through their data. Security experts say many firms are only just starting to realize the risks they assume by embracing Web-based collaborative tools hosted by a U.S. company, a problem even more acute in Canada where federal privacy rules are at odds with U.S. security measures.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 11:06 pm (UTC)Но даже оставив это в стороне, действительно важные данные надо хранить в зашифрованном виде и под своим физическим контролем. При любой юрисдикции.
А не особенно важные можно, если что, без страха показать властям. Типа моей ЖЖ-шной переписки, которая спокойно хранится на gmail -- она всё равно доступна через поиск по комментам.